Saturday, May 24, 2008

May in Ohio

A few posts ago I mentioned my plans to write some on the Bible, particularly why I believe it is God-inspired. I did not mean to just "tease" all of you about that -- I will write some more on that subject.

Right now I am visiting my parents in Ohio. My Mom mentioned how hot it is today -- mid-70s, while my wife and children talked about how cool it felt outside.

It is sunny and the temperature is perfect. Add to that, we had the chance to eat at Skyline for lunch! Good stuff!

All of this is to say that I'll blog when I can, but am taking the time to enjoy being with extended family.

Hope everyone is enjoying their Memorial Day weekend.

Labels:

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Hat Trick

Congratulations to Drew Brewster who hit 3 homeruns in his last baseball game. Drew has consistenly played well (hitting and fielding at second base, shortstop and third base), but last night he raised his game to a new level.

Great job, Drew!

Labels: ,

Monday, May 19, 2008

Veracity

How do you know the Bible is true?

What tool do you use to confirm the veracity of what are called the "holy scriptures"?

Is it a hunch?

Is it simply a confirmation of what you have always been taught?

Is it a matter of blind faith?

Why can we believe that groups of men in church councils were authorized to choose which books/letters should be part of the canon?

How do we know that the entire process was not politically tainted?

My bias says that the forming of the canon was not politically tainted. My bias is also that the Bible is inspired by God and without error.

Why do I believe these things?

Well, I guess you'll have to keep reading this blog to find out.

On more note: there are different avenues to take in supporting the view that the Bible is inspired. One avenue is the historical approach (probably my favorite). Another is the reason/logic approach (not my favorite, but it does have some merit). A third avenue is to not attempt to prove anything and say all a person needs is more faith (we will not drive down that avenue on this blog).

Labels:

Thursday, May 15, 2008

The "F Words" in Prayer

The other day as I was reading through the Gospel of Mark, I came across some verses that seemed a little out of sync. The verses are found in chapter 11 (vv. 23-26) where Jesus is talking about prayer. He says that if we have faith that anything is possible (even throwing a mountain into the sea). As if that verse is not confusing enough, he follows it up with this one:

"And whenever you stand praying, forgive, if you have anything against anyone; so that your Father also who is in heaven may forgive you your transgressions. But if you do not forgive, neither will your Father who is in heaven forgive your transgressions."

At first glance it seems that these verses do not fit. Jesus speaks about the necessary component of faith in our prayers, then switches gears by talking about forgiveness.

What gives?

Actually, Jesus never switches gears. Rather, he extrapolates on two "must" aspects of our prayers: 1) faith and 2) forgiveness. If either of these is missing, then our prayers become ineffective. Translation: God refuses to hear them.

The word "forgive" in these verses literally means "to cancel a debt." Someone owes you something? Cancel the debt.

Someone has offended you. Move on.

Someone has angered you. Don't look back.

Someone has let you down. Leave it in the past.

The basis for our forgiveness of others is God's forgiveness of us. We can forgive, because God has forgiven us. Our debt to God far outweighs any sin committed against us by others. This is the point that Jesus makes in the Lord's Prayer when he prays, "Forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors" (Matthew 6:12).

Forgiveness is not simply uttering a few words, it is a decision to do several things: 1) to not harm the person who has hurt, offended, or let you down; and 2) it is a decision to leave the past in the past. A sure sign that forgiveness has not taken place is when a person continually brings up a sin from the past. The book of Proverbs warns against the destruction that doing such will bring ("He who covers a transgression seeks love, but he who repeats a matter separates intimate friends." Proverbs 17:9).

Here, though, Jesus warns us that our prayers will be ineffective until we truly forgive others.

I like how the Message paraphrases this verse: "And when you assume the posture of prayer, remember that it's not all asking. If you have anything against someone, forgive -- only then will your heavenly Father be inclined to also wipe your slate clean of sins."

Pray in faith.

Pray with forgiveness in your heart.

Pray effectively.

Labels:

Monday, May 12, 2008

The Impossibility of Making Things Right

Throughout history, opponents of the Christian faith have argued against any need for a "savior." From moral relativism arguments to the development of theories about "memes" (courtesy of Richard Dawkins), those who argue against particular faith systems ultimately hinge their arguments on the belief that since we are free moral agents, we are free to determine right and wrong.

Upon second glance that seems more like an argument for anarchy than an anti-Christian argument.

The Bible (which I know opponents of the Christian faith do not believe is an authority of living), teaches us that we have a "sIn" problem. And right in the middle of that "sIn" problem is a big "I." You see, sIn is something that we do. It is seen not only in the choices we make and the actions we take, but it is also witnessed in the motivations behind those choices and actions.

Such a realization impresses on us that sin is not as easily managed as we think it is. To combat this discovery, we attempt to categorize sin. We begin to measure ourselves against others. The thought pattern emerges, "Well, I've never done what so-and-so down the street has done, so I'm not so bad."

Not only does this thought process provide us a false sense of comfort, but it it also gives us a platform for rationalizing our sins.

However, the Bible leads us down a distinctly different avenue of thought. The Bible discloses to us that sin is everyone's problem. Everyone who has sinned, is sinning, and will sin finds themselves in the same desperate situation: as guilty of breaking God's law.

Under the justice system the result is painfully obvious -- break the law, pay the penalty.

And we are all guilty.

Here is how James (brother of Jesus, author of NT book) puts it: "My dear brothers and sisters, how can you claim to have faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ if you favor some people over others? ...Yes, indeed, it is good when you obey the royal law as found in the Scriptures: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' But if you favor some people over others, you are committing a sin. You are guilty of breaking the law. For the person who keeps all of the laws except one is as guilty as a person who has broken all of God's laws. For the same God who said, 'You must not commit adultery,' also said, 'You must not murder.' So if you murder someone but do not commit adultery, you have still broken the law" (James 2:1, 8-11).

So where is the hope? If we are all in the same boat (breaking God's law) then how do we make things right?

We can't.

I know we are to confess our sins, turn away from them, and walk a different path, but in the end even doing all those things means nothing if not for something that God gives to us -- grace.

If any of us makes it to heaven we will all do so in the same way -- by God's grace.

That is what makes grace ... so ... amazing.

Labels: ,

Friday, May 09, 2008

Right as Rain


From the immortal voice of Layne Staley and the unique sound of Alice in Chains:

when i waken
and i'm achin
'time for sleepin', yeah

when i'm sayin'
time to go and
i've been hurtin', yeah

when i'm layin'
i'm still trying
concentrating on dyin', yeah

you're right as rain
but you're wrong to blame
agreed my crime's the same
my sins i'll claim
give you back shed pain
go find a place for own shame,
yeah
so you can deal
with this thing unreal
no one made you feel any hurt,
yeah

body's movin'
only provin'
no one heeds to move

still believin'
yet mistaken
all god's children, yeah

and i must say
i was stupid
selfishly she consumed, yeah

and you must changed
patterns all we trained
or n'er regain peace you seek
now you hear me
for the things i see
yeah, i believe in inner peace, yeah

throw out
blow up
hold in

show fine
no signs
grow blind

Labels:

Thursday, May 08, 2008

What is Required?

As a teenager I remember attending major church youth gatherings that brought in anywhere from 10,000-20,000 teens.

Getting so many teens together creates many memorable moments. As a teenager I also remember attending various concerts and other "arena events." At some of these, one side of the arena would begin shouting, "We love Jesus yes we do, we love Jesus, how about you?" They would end the chant by pointing to the other side. Then, the other side would repeat and both sides would go back and forth to see who could get the loudest.

As if God is hard of hearing.

Such instances made me wonder about my relationship with God. Is it a matter of "outdoing" other people of faith? Is it simply proving my religious superiority? Is it really possible to garner merit from God if I sing louder or pray longer, or speak in a religiously verbose tone?

Unfortunately from a carnal (fleshly, human) perspective the answer is "yes." We put so much stock in appearances that it seems many Christ-followers attempt to outdo other Christ-followers. Who has the biggest facility? Who has the most people on Sunday? Who has the greatest number of programs? Which congregation has the favor of city officials and other politicians?

And it is not just in outward appearances that we try to outdo each other. We take our biblical interpretations and claim they make us more faithful to God. We shake our heads at other religious groups and state that they have it wrong.

In the process we prop ourselves up on a religious pedestal so that God won't overlook us and so that everyone else will notice us.

Yet from a spiritual viewpoint, my relationship with God does not depend on an outward show or a particular intellectual approach to the Bible.

We have a habit of requiring things that God does not. We think that if we do certain things we will become more pleasing to God. We are only pleasing to God because of God's grace. And it is because of this grace that we can then fulfill what God requires.

And what does God require?

"He has shown you, O man, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you but to act justly, love mercy and walk humbly with your God." (Micah 6:8)

Jesus further explained these requirements by summing up all of God's laws in two commands: 1) love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength; and 2) love your neighbor as yourself. (Matthew 22:36-39)

A relationship with God hinges on these two commands and nothing else. Get these right and you will get life with God right. Get these wrong, and you will pompously march around in a religious cloak that is tantamount to a cheap Halloween costume.

Two commands.

God is not the god of confusion.

Go and love.

Labels:

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

#9


Happy Birthday, Drew!

The Drewster is now 9.

I love being your Daddy!

Labels:

Friday, May 02, 2008

Character


Sportswriter Graham Hays recently posted this story on the espn.com website. It is a reminder of what it means to have character. It is a bold statement about what really matters in the end. The next time you hear parents screaming at their kids or coaches berating players for making mistakes, remember this story.

Western Oregon senior Sara Tucholsky had never hit a home run in her career. Central Washington senior Mallory Holtman was already her school's career leader in them. But when a twist of fate and a torn knee ligament brought them face to face with each other and face to face with the end of their playing days, they combined on a home run trot that celebrated the collective human spirit far more than individual athletic achievement.

Both schools compete as Division II softball programs in the Great Northwest Athletic Conference. Neither has ever reached the NCAA tournament at the Division II level. But when they arrived for Saturday's conference doubleheader at Central Washington's 300-seat stadium in Ellensburg, a small town 100 miles and a mountain range removed from Seattle, the hosts resided one game behind the visitors at the top of the conference standings. As was the case at dozens of other diamonds across the map, two largely anonymous groups prepared to play the most meaningful games of their seasons.

It was a typical Saturday of softball in April, right down to a few overzealous fans heckling an easy target, the diminutive Tucholsky, when she came to the plate in the top of the second inning of the second game with two runners on base and the game still scoreless after Western Oregon's 8-1 win in the first game of the afternoon.

"I just remember trying to block them out," Tucholsky said of the hecklers. "The first pitch I took, it was a strike. And then I really don't remember where the home run pitch was at all; [I] just remember hitting it, and I knew it was out."

A part-time starter in the outfield throughout her four years, Tucholsky had been caught in a numbers game this season on a deep roster that entered the weekend hitting better than .280 and having won nine games in a row. Prior to the pitch she sent over the center-field fence, she had just three hits in 34 at-bats this season. And in that respect, her hitting heroics would have made for a pleasing, if familiar, story line on their own: an unsung player steps up in one of her final games and lifts her team's postseason chances.

But it was what happened after an overly excited Tucholsky missed first base on her home run trot and reversed direction to tag the bag that proved unforgettable.

"Sara is small -- she's like 5-2, really tiny," Western Oregon coach Pam Knox said. "So you would never think that she would hit a home run. The score was 0-0, and Sara hit a shot over center field. And I'm coaching third and I'm high-fiving the other two runners that came by -- then all of a sudden, I look up, and I'm like, 'Where's Sara?' And I look over, and she's in a heap beyond first base."

While she was doubling back to tag first base, Tucholsky's right knee gave out. The two runners who had been on base already had crossed home plate, leaving her the only offensive player on the field of play, even as she lay crumpled in the dirt a few feet from first base and a long way from home plate. First-base coach Shannon Prochaska -- Tucholsky's teammate for three seasons and the only voice she later remembered hearing in the ensuing conversation -- checked to see whether she could crawl back to the base under her own power.

As Knox explained, "It went through my mind, I thought, 'If I touch her, she's going to kill me.' It's her only home run in four years. I didn't want to take that from her, but at the same time, I was worried about her."

Umpires confirmed that the only option available under the rules was to replace Tucholsky at first base with a pinch runner and have the hit recorded as a two-run single instead of a three-run home run. Any assistance from coaches or trainers while she was an active runner would result in an out. So without any choice, Knox prepared to make the substitution, taking both the run and the memory from Tucholsky.

"And right then," Knox said, "I heard, 'Excuse me, would it be OK if we carried her around and she touched each bag?'"

The voice belonged to Holtman, a four-year starter who owns just about every major offensive record there is to claim in Central Washington's record book. She also is staring down a pair of knee surgeries as soon as the season ends. Her knees ache after every game, but having already used a redshirt season earlier in her career, and ready to move on to graduate school and coaching at Central, she put the operations on hold so as to avoid missing any of her final season. Now, with her own opportunity for a first postseason appearance very much hinging on the outcome of the game -- her final game at home -- she stepped up to help a player she knew only as an opponent for four years.

"Honestly, it's one of those things that I hope anyone would do it for me," Holtman said. "She hit the ball over her fence. She's a senior; it's her last year. … I don't know, it's just one of those things I guess that maybe because compared to everyone on the field at the time, I had been playing longer and knew we could touch her, it was my idea first. But I think anyone who knew that we could touch her would have offered to do it, just because it's the right thing to do. She was obviously in agony."

Holtman and shortstop Liz Wallace lifted Tucholsky off the ground and supported her weight between them as they began a slow trip around the bases, stopping at each one so Tucholsky's left foot could secure her passage onward. Even with Tucholsky feeling the pain of what trainers subsequently came to believe was a torn ACL (she was scheduled for tests to confirm the injury on Monday), the surreal quality of perhaps the longest and most crowded home run trot in the game's history hit all three players.

"We all started to laugh at one point, I think when we touched the first base," Holtman said. "I don't know what it looked like to observers, but it was kind of funny because Liz and I were carrying her on both sides and we'd get to a base and gently, barely tap her left foot, and we'd all of a sudden start to get the giggles a little bit."

Accompanied by a standing ovation from the fans, they finally reached home plate and passed the home run hitter into the arms of her own teammates.

Then Holtman and Wallace returned to their positions and tried to win the game.

Hollywood would have a difficult time deciding how such a script should end, whether to leave Tucholsky's home run as the decisive blow or reward the selfless actions of her opponents. Reality has less room for such philosophical quandaries. Central Washington did rally for two runs in the bottom of the second -- runs that might have tied the game had Knox been forced to replace Tucholsky -- but Western Oregon held on for a 4-2 win.

But unlike a movie, the credits didn't roll after the final out, and the story that continues has little to do with those final scores.

"It kept everything in perspective and the fact that we're never bigger than the game," Knox said of the experience. "It was such a lesson that we learned --that it's not all about winning. And we forget that, because as coaches, we're always trying to get to the top. We forget that. But I will never, ever forget this moment. It's changed me, and I'm sure it's changed my players."

For her part, Holtman seems not altogether sure what all the fuss is about. She seems to genuinely believe that any player in her position on any field on any day would have done the same thing. Which helps explains why it did happen on that day and on that field.

And she appreciates the knowledge that while the results of Saturday's game and her senior season soon will fade into the dust and depth of old media guides and Internet archives, the story of what happened in her final game at home will live on far longer.

"I think that happening on Senior Day, it showed the character of our team," Holtman said. "Because granted I thought of it, but everyone else would have done it. It's something people will talk about for Senior Day. They won't talk about who got hits and what happened and who won; they'll talk about that. And it's kind of a nice way to go out, because it shows what our program is about and the kind of people we have here."

Labels: