Subjective Objectivity?
The disintegration that follows adherents of subjective reasoning alone has led more than one searcher to abandon the journey, because he thinks there is no destination.
Subjective reasoning is when a person formulates philosophy or theology based on personal preferences. This line of thinking is reflective of "if-it-makes-me-feel-good-then-it-is-good-philosophy." According to this line of reasoning, truth is what we prefer it to be. Truth is a creation of our desires, wishes and personalities. As such, truth evolves depending on our own personal experience.
Objective reasoning is when a person seeks to forumate philosophy or theology based on an already-established standard. This person does not claim to have the truth in its totality, nor to reinvent the truth. Instead, this person recognizes that in arriving at truth we embark and continue on a journey. The journey is a lifelong process. The inability to completely grasp the truth does not deter the searcher from his journey. His quest is as important as his destination, but he realizes there is an objective truth that is not determined by personal fancies.
In religious circles, it appears that the subjective reasoning group is increasing, while the objective-reasoning group is shrinking. Both groups view each other with suspicious eyes. Of course, for the subjective group, suspicion varies from day-to-day based on emotions.
For the objective group, emotions are not a sure guide to finding truth. For these people, truth is truth whether or not it makes me feel good or happy.
Which one will lead us closer to the truth -- subjective reasoning or objective reasoning?
Journey on, friends.
The truth is still out there.
